Jumat, 21 September 2018

2 Key Lessons From Facebook’s Video Views Metrics Fiasco

2 Key Lessons From Facebook’s Video Views Metrics Fiasco - Hi, friend Internet Marketing, in this article entitled 2 Key Lessons From Facebook’s Video Views Metrics Fiasco, we have prepared this article well and concise to be easy to understand for you to read and can be taken inside information. hopefully the contents of the post Article Culture of Analytics, Article KPIs, Article metrics, that we write this you can understand and useful. okay, happy reading.

People have quick time period reminiscence (or selective memory), while they can’t be counted issues they'll lodge to how they assume anything ought to be. Recently Facebook was within the hot seat as a consequence of this very reason. 

Facebook metrics definition issue

Facebook has a metrics referred to as “Video View” for video ads.  In this metric they merely counted the video as seen if it was watched extra than 3 seconds via means of the viewer.  In different words, if human being watches a video for 2 seconds then that video view won’t rely as a view on this metric.

Facebook also has one other metrics, referred to as “Average length of Video views”, the “standard” definition of it ought to be Total Time spent looking video divided via means of Total Viewers. However, that’s now not how Facebook described it.  In Sept Wall Street Journal stated that Facebook "vastly overrated typical viewing time for video ads on its platform for NULL years.”  This result in an apology from Facebook

About a month ago, we found an error in the way we calculate one of the video metrics on our dashboard – average duration of video viewed. The metric should have reflected the total time spent watching a video divided by the total number of people who played the video. But it didn't – it reflected the total time spent watching a video divided by only the number of “views” of a video (that is, when the video was watched for three or more seconds). And so the miscalculation overstated this metric. While this is only one of the many metrics marketers look at, we take any mistake seriously.

As per DM News article, Facebook did state the definition when it rolled out this metric two years ago.  So it was not actually doing anything wrong.  It was a case of short term memory issue.

“The problem, as critics put it, is a problem of omission. While Facebook very clearly states that it's only counting views as any video-play event that lasts longer than three seconds, it does not go out of its way to explicitly beat readers over the head with the fact that this definition of a "video view" applies equally to the calculation of average duration of video views.”

If Facebook product team had read my posts from 2012 on “Creating a culture of analytics” then they might have likely avoided this “scandal”. The two issues that Facebook dealt with were the exact same ones I talked about in my posts. To recap, here are the gist of those two posts:
  • Make sure everybody understands clearly how metrics are defined.  I talked about this in my post in 2012, Standard Definitions of Metrics: Creating a Culture of Analytics. In that post I said 

  • Lack of standard definitions for the metrics causes people to report different numbers for supposedly same metrics, leading to confusion and total lack of trust in data.  No trust in data means that nobody is going to use the data to make strategic decisions and there goes all your efforts to create a culture of Analytics.

    Having standard definitions is not as easy as it sounds.  It starts from you and your team having a clear understanding on how to calculate various metrics.   Some seemingly simple metrics can be calculated in various different ways and all of those ways might be right but getting one standard way of calculating those removes any confusion and gets everybody on the same page.
  • People have short term memory.  In my 2012 post, titled  Dealing with Short-Term Memory: Creating a Culture of Analytics,  I wrote:

    We all make assumptions from time to time; sometime we state them clearly and sometimes we just assume in our own head. We then operate under those assumptions.  In context of Analytics, one such assumption is that everybody knows what the goals and KPIs are.  We might have defined them on the onset of the program, campaign, beginning of month, quarter, year etc., but once those are defined we start to assume that everybody knows about them and is operating keeping those goals in mind.

    Well the truth is that people have short term memory. They do forget and then start to interpret the KPIs, defined based on those goals, in their own way.  As the Analytics head/analyst/manager, it is your job to constantly remind stakeholders of the goals and KPIs. 
Two Lessons

This fiasco provides two great lesson for all the Digital Analytics teams.

1.       Clearly define your metrics and make sure the underlying metrics and calculations are clear in your definition.
2.       Don’t make any assumptions, people have short term memory. Just because you stated a definition of a KPI in past does not mean everybody will remember it and know how tit was calculated. It is your job to make sure anybody using your metrics/KPI can get to the definition and calculations right away. 

Questions? Comments?

Thank You and Good article 2 Key Lessons From Facebook’s Video Views Metrics Fiasco this time, hopefully can benefit for you all. see you in other article postings.

You are now reading the article2 Key Lessons From Facebook’s Video Views Metrics Fiasco with the link address http://www.ir2.me/2018/09/2-key-lessons-from-facebooks-video.html

0 komentar

Posting Komentar